The new executive order on immigration, dubbed “MuslimBan 2.0” signed March 6, 2017 presents a more nuanced, but still ultimately unconstitutional affront to religious liberty. Reviewing the redline version prepared by the ACLU of Massachusetts, coupled with the implementing memorandum to DHS, and the letter from AG Jeff Sessions and S-DHS Kelly to President Trump, a few themes emerge.
The new ban still suffers from a very ominous deficiency: both the administration and terrorist groups stand to benefit from another attack. This is one reason the 10 national security officials stated these types of blanket bans are a bad idea, even if they are later tempered. Our judiciary took care of the first ban, but this administration has a narrative they want to protect and nurture. And they will keep blue penciling this order until some court somewhere upholds it.
There will be legal challenge. Where any new case is brought will have tremendous effect. I suspect some of the ongoing litigation will be turned to the new order, since it raises many of the same issues.
What are some things ordinary folks can do?
Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature
The HMA Law Firm Does Not And Shall Not Discriminate On The Basis Of Race, Color, Religion (Creed), Gender, Gender Expression, Age, National Origin (Ancestry), Disability, Marital Status, Sexual Orientation, Or Military Status, In Any Of Its Activities Or Operations. These Activities Include, But Are Not Limited To, Hiring And Firing Of Staff, Selection Of Volunteers And Vendors, And Provision Of Services. We Are Committed To Providing An Inclusive And Welcoming Environment For All.
©2009 – 2020 by Hassan M. Ahmad. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be copied or reproduced for any purpose without express written permission.