The HMA LAW FIRM

Youtube Instagram Twitter Facebook Linkedin
  • By: adminhmalegal
  • Jun 1
  • Comments (0)

It’s always nice to share good news.  HMALF attorney Hassan Ahmad just completed a brief for an foreign national whose green card application had been stuck in limbo for 5 years.

The reason?  No one thought they had jurisdiction to decide his application!  This is what happens when your system is made up of so many parts that don’t always work together.  It’s kind of like driving a car pressing the gas and the brake at the same time.

In this case, it has to do with certain aliens in removal proceedings who have ported employers under INA 204(j).  This section of law was passed as part of the American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (often abbreviated “AC21”) and helps remedy the interminably long process of getting a green card based on employment by a US employer.  Since these cases took so long, aliens took a big risk: there was no guarantee the employer would still be around by the time the government was able to decide his green card application.  So 204(j) allows aliens who have a green card application pending for more than 180 days to switch employers, so long as the new position is “the same or substantially similar occupation” as the one for which he was originally petitioned for.

The problem arose in the case of an alien in removal proceedings.  An employer petition is filed with USCIS, which is the only agency that can decide that petition.  Once an alien is in removal proceedings, the immigration judge is the only one who can decide the alien’s green card application, and USCIS has no power to do so.

Ordinarily then, an immigration judge will wait for the petition to be approved or denied by USCIS, and then decide the green card application accordingly.  But when an alien changes employers, then someone has to judge whether the new position is the “same or substantially similar” occupation as the original.  Who decides? 

Well, USCIS refused to do so.  In 2005 the Board of Immigration Appeals decided Matter of Perez Vargas, 23 I&N Dec. 829 (BIA 2005), and said that immigration judges couldn’t either.  So employment sponsored aliens in removal proceedings were at an impasse.  No one would adjudicate their green card applications!

Happily, the Board reversed itself.  After Perez Vargas was shot down by the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Circuits, on January 21, 2010 the Board decided Matter of Marcal Neto, 23 I&N Dec. 169 (BIA 2010), concluding that immigration judges do in fact have the jurisdiction over 204(j) employer ports.

Great news for an undoubtedly large class of aliens whose files likely landed in the office of a Detention & Removal officer.  If you are (or were) in removal proceedings and your case was denied or administratively closed because the Court concluded it couldn’t decide your application because you switched employers, contact an attorney now.

  • Share:
Previous Article: EXCEPTIONAL AND EXTREMELY UNUSUAL HARDSHIP
Next Article WHEN IS A CRIMINAL ALIEN A CRIMINAL?

Add your Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Categories

  • Appellate
  • Asylum
  • Business Law
  • CBP
  • Citizenship
  • Constitutional Rights
  • Criminal
  • Criminal Law
  • DACA
  • Deportation
  • Drugs Crime
  • Education Law
  • Family
  • Family Law
  • Framing
  • General
  • H 1B
  • Hma Law Firm
  • Immigration
  • Immigration Policy
  • Immigration Reform
  • International
  • Interns
  • Muslim Ban
  • National Security
  • Personal Injury
  • Politics
  • Removal
  • Syria
  • Tanton FOIA Lawsuit
  • Trump
  • Uncategorized
  • Waivers

Tags

Accident Attorney Consultation Crime Criminal DACA daca immigration daca in full effect daca news today DACA policy Fraud Hassan Ahmad hmalawfirm Immigration latest news on daca Law Lawyer Michigan Supreme Court Supremecourt ruling on Tanton Papers Tanton Papers Secret trump administration

Recent Posts

  • Filing Form N-600K To Apply For Citizenship Based on Parentage 24 Nov 2021
  • VISA BULLETIN JUNE 2021 16 Oct 2021
  • Driver license for undocumented migrants: Virginia 04 Oct 2021

Contact Us

  • Head Office Address8133 Leesburg Pike #801, Vienna, VA 22182, United States
  • Phone: +1(703) 964-0245
  • Email: [email protected]
  • Website: www.hma-legal.com

Contrary to popular belief, Lorem Ipsum is not simply random text. It has roots in a piece of classical Latin literature

Quick Link

  • Home
  • Home
  • Home
  • +1(703) 964-0245 (Click to call)
  • +1(866) 996-1431 Toll-Free available during. Office hours.
  • [email protected]
  • 8133 Leesburg Pike, Ste 801 Vienna, VA 22182
Youtube Instagram Twitter Facebook Linkedin
Pay Here
A convinient and secure way to make your payment
Click here to pay

The HMA Law Firm Does Not And Shall Not Discriminate On The Basis Of Race, Color, Religion (Creed), Gender, Gender Expression, Age, National Origin (Ancestry), Disability, Marital Status, Sexual Orientation, Or Military Status, In Any Of Its Activities Or Operations. These Activities Include, But Are Not Limited To, Hiring And Firing Of Staff, Selection Of Volunteers And Vendors, And Provision Of Services. We Are Committed To Providing An Inclusive And Welcoming Environment For All.

©2009 – 2020 by Hassan M. Ahmad. All rights reserved. No portion of this website may be copied or reproduced for any purpose without express written permission.